| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 12-17-2024 11:40 PST |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Simple ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0000374 | [Resin] | minor | always | 08-30-05 00:00 | 11-30-05 14:42 | ||||
| Reporter | user370 | View Status | public | ||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | Platform | |||||
| Status | closed | OS | |||||||
| Projection | none | OS Version | |||||||
| ETA | none | Fixed in Version | 3.0.15 | Product Version | 3.0.14 | ||||
| Product Build | 3.0.14 | ||||||||
| Summary | 0000374: CDATA character set too small? | ||||||||
| Description |
RSN-418 The caucho XmlParser has this definition of a valid character in a CDATA section: private boolean isChar(int ch) { return (ch >= 0x20 && ch <= 0xd7ff || ch == 0x9 || ch == 0xa || ch == 0xd || ch >= 0xe000 && ch <= 0xfff0); } But the XML spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#NT-Char) [^] says: Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] | [#x10000-#x10FFFF] Note that caucho doesn't include FFF1 to FFFD. Is this a bug? |
||||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | |||||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
 Relationships |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
(0000431) user383 08-30-05 00:00 |
I have encountered this as well and I think it's a bug. This isn't much of problem in English, but it is when dealing with multibyte characters in UTF-8. |
|
(0000432) ferg 08-30-05 00:00 |
xml/0057 |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 08-30-05 00:00 | user370 | New Issue | |
| 11-30-05 00:00 | administrator | Fixed in Version | => 3.0.15 |
| 11-30-05 14:42 | ferg | Status | resolved => closed |
| Mantis 1.0.0rc3[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2005 Mantis Group
36 total queries executed. 29 unique queries executed. |  |
