Mantis - Resin
|
|||||
Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|||||
ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
374 | minor | always | 08-30-05 00:00 | 11-30-05 14:42 | |
|
|||||
Reporter: | user370 | Platform: | |||
Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
Status: | closed | Product Version: | 3.0.14 | ||
Product Build: | 3.0.14 | Resolution: | fixed | ||
Projection: | none | ||||
ETA: | none | Fixed in Version: | 3.0.15 | ||
|
|||||
Summary: | 0000374: CDATA character set too small? | ||||
Description: |
RSN-418 The caucho XmlParser has this definition of a valid character in a CDATA section: private boolean isChar(int ch) { return (ch >= 0x20 && ch <= 0xd7ff || ch == 0x9 || ch == 0xa || ch == 0xd || ch >= 0xe000 && ch <= 0xfff0); } But the XML spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#NT-Char) [^] says: Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] | [#x10000-#x10FFFF] Note that caucho doesn't include FFF1 to FFFD. Is this a bug? |
||||
Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
Additional Information: | |||||
Relationships | |||||
Attached Files: |
Notes | |||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|