Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 10-08-2024 14:58 PDT |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0003468 | [Resin] | minor | always | 04-29-09 14:24 | 09-11-09 17:48 | ||||
Reporter | ferg | View Status | public | ||||||
Assigned To | ferg | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Status | closed | Product Version | |||||||
Summary | 0003468: class-loader issues - candi binding | ||||||||
Description |
(rep by Scott Hernandez) The behaviour has changed, but the problem still exists. It now just says that it can't find a registered bean. However, in walking through the code (at runtime), I can see there are valid beans in the (parent) manager. I'm guessing there is a classloader issue, and that the classes are not equal (even thought they are the same textual name). The bindings on my field (java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue org.subethamail.core.queue.InjectListener.outboundQueue) are: [@org.subethamail.core.queue.DeliveryQueue()] And there are two Queue(s) in the (parent) manager that look like this: SimpleBean[MemoryQueue, {@org.subethamail.core.queue.DeliveryQueue()}, @Production, name=delivery, @ApplicationScope] SimpleBean[MemoryQueue, {@org.subethamail.core.queue.InjectQueue()}, @Production, name=injection, @ApplicationScope] It sure seems like it should be matching the first one. |
||||||||
Additional Information | |||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
|
Mantis 1.0.0rc3[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2005 Mantis Group
30 total queries executed. 26 unique queries executed. |