| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 10-28-2025 13:17 PDT |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0003297 | [Quercus] | major | always | 01-26-09 14:06 | 01-29-09 14:42 | ||||
| Reporter | koreth | View Status | public | ||||||
| Assigned To | ferg | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
| Status | closed | Product Version | 4.0.0 | ||||||
| Summary | 0003297: hash_hmac() is slow | ||||||||
| Description |
<?php $message = str_repeat('x', 1000); $key = base64_decode("NMvhzq3jlze/4WlyuRXQ5w=="); $hash_key = base64_decode("CdMQm0q6JeUgalXRwQQZ1h/8WQA7fJh1OuY0xuZooxQ="); $start = microtime(true); for ($idx=0; $idx < 10000; $idx++) { $hash_val = hash_hmac('md5', $message, $hash_key, true); } print microtime(true) - $start; This reports a run time of about 75ms under Zend PHP and about 610ms under Quercus in compiled mode (after repeated reloads to make sure the JVM has properly compiled everything.) |
||||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
 Relationships |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
(0003786) ferg 01-29-09 14:42 |
With the improved performance, Quercus is still slower (by 2x on my system). The time is mostly spent inside the crypto routines. This may be a case where Java is just slower than C for highly numerical calculations. |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 01-26-09 14:06 | koreth | New Issue | |
| 01-29-09 14:42 | ferg | Note Added: 0003786 | |
| 01-29-09 14:42 | ferg | Assigned To | => ferg |
| 01-29-09 14:42 | ferg | Status | new => closed |
| 01-29-09 14:42 | ferg | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 01-29-09 14:42 | ferg | Fixed in Version | => 4.0.0 |
| Mantis 1.0.0rc3[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2005 Mantis Group
29 total queries executed. 26 unique queries executed. |  |
