Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 12-17-2024 10:39 PST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Advanced Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Simple ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0001911 | [Resin] | minor | always | 07-30-07 09:07 | 08-28-07 19:28 | ||||
Reporter | ferg | View Status | public | ||||||
Assigned To | ferg | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | Platform | |||||
Status | closed | OS | |||||||
Projection | none | OS Version | |||||||
ETA | none | Fixed in Version | 3.1.3 | Product Version | |||||
Product Build | |||||||||
Summary | 0001911: cluster sessions: block 0 is reserved | ||||||||
Description |
(rep by Ethan Larson) We just completed the upgrade to 3.1.2 from 3.1.1, which included a switch to clusterstore from jdbcstore as well. Things look good, except when we shut one of the nodes down, some of the other nodes in the cluster will sometimes throw this exception: [11:57:01.935] java.lang.IllegalStateException: Block 0 is reserved. [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.db.store.BlockManager.stateError(BlockManager.java:329) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.db.store.BlockManager.getBlock(BlockManager.java:240) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.db.store.Store.readBlock(Store.java:466) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.db.store.Store.readMiniFragment(Store.java:1319) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.db.store.Inode.read(Inode.java:302) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.db.store.BlobInputStream.read(BlobInputStream.java:114) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.server.cluster.ClusterStore.dumpObjects(ClusterStore.java:1231) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.server.hmux.HmuxClusterRequest.dumpObjects(HmuxClusterRequest.java:391) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.server.hmux.HmuxClusterRequest.handleRequest(HmuxClusterRequest.java:178) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.server.hmux.HmuxRequest.scanHeaders(HmuxRequest.java:641) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.server.hmux.HmuxRequest.handleRequest(HmuxRequest.java:354) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.server.port.TcpConnection.run(TcpConnection.java:481) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.util.ThreadPool$Item.runTasks(ThreadPool.java:685) [11:57:01.935] at com.caucho.util.ThreadPool$Item.run(ThreadPool.java:607) [11:57:01.935] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Is this something to worry about? Should I file a bug? I found a similar bug in mantis here: http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=4 [^] |
||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||||||
Additional Information | |||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
|
Notes | |
(0002246) ferg 08-28-07 19:28 |
SelectResult needed to be updated to correct size of TempBuffer.SIZE |
Mantis 1.0.0rc3[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2005 Mantis Group
28 total queries executed. 25 unique queries executed. |