|
Mantis - Hessian
|
|||||
| Viewing Issue Advanced Details | |||||
|
|
|||||
| ID: | Category: | Severity: | Reproducibility: | Date Submitted: | Last Update: |
| 4498 | minor | always | 04-12-11 11:56 | 04-12-11 11:56 | |
|
|
|||||
| Reporter: | ferg | Platform: | |||
| Assigned To: | OS: | ||||
| Priority: | normal | OS Version: | |||
| Status: | new | Product Version: | |||
| Product Build: | Resolution: | open | |||
| Projection: | none | ||||
| ETA: | none | Fixed in Version: | |||
|
|
|||||
| Summary: | 0004498: Hessian mapping of class names | ||||
| Description: |
(rep by Simon Watson) I'm very new to Hessian and, having got the basic examples working plus reviewed the docs, I have a question - is it possible to pass Java objects via Hessian that implement a common interface, but have different client/server implementations? I'd like to use it for communication between an Android app and a Spring web application. The Java interfaces for objects passed back and forth are shared, but the server-side implementation of them contains additional JPA stuff which I'd rather not have on the Android client side. Is there any way of (de)serializing objects with a neutral name (rather than fully qualified class name), and define a mapping between this and the different implementations on each side? |
||||
| Steps To Reproduce: | |||||
| Additional Information: | |||||
| Relationships | |||||
| Attached Files: | |||||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |